We asked businesses who've worked with us to share their honest perspectives. No scripts, no cherry-picking – just real feedback from people who needed better website performance and trusted us to help.
After your site goes live, we wait about a month and a half. That gives you time to see real results and form an actual opinion. Then someone from our team reaches out – usually by email, sometimes a quick call if you prefer.
We keep it straightforward. How's the site performing? Did we deliver what we promised? What would you change? And the big one: would you work with us again? Some answers are glowing, some point out things we missed. Both types help us improve.
We don't filter negative feedback or incentivize positive reviews. Every client gets the same follow-up process, and we publish responses as they come – good, bad, or somewhere in between.
Every review comes from a paying client. We match each testimonial to an actual project in our system before publishing anything.
We fix typos if someone asks, but we don't rewrite feedback to sound better. If a client mentions something we dropped the ball on, that stays in.
Each review shows when the project started and when we collected feedback. That context matters – newer reviews reflect our current approach.
Not every client relationship goes perfectly. Sometimes expectations don't align, or technical constraints pop up mid-project. We've learned that certain factors really affect outcomes.
We try to flag potential issues during discovery. But honestly, some challenges only become clear once we're deep into a project. That's when good communication becomes critical.
Client Retention
73%